Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

On January 15, Changan Automobile’s new high-end electric vehicle brand "Avita" was officially released, and the first model of the new brand "Avita 11" was also unveiled simultaneously. Changan Automobile hopes to create "emotional intelligent electric vehicles" through this new brand, occupy a place in the high-end electric vehicle market, and narrow the gap with Tesla, NIO and other new car-making forces.

Before the debut of the Avita brand, Changan Automobile’s new energy vehicle business had significantly lagged behind the market development trend and the pace of progress of competitors, especially in the mid-to-high-end new energy vehicle market. Competitors such as SAIC Group, Dongfeng Group, GAC Group, BAIC Group, and Geely Automobile have all launched mid-to-high-end new energy brands that operate independently. Therefore, the success of the Avita brand is very critical to Changan Automobile.

Chongqing is Avita’s manufacturing base, with an annual production capacity of up to 350,000 units. Brand public relations, marketing and other departments, as well as software research and development are located in Shanghai – on October 21, Avita Technology established a wholly-owned Avita New Energy Vehicle Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., with a global design center in Munich, Germany.

Avita plans to launch four models in the next five years. Among them, the first Avita 11 white body has been trial-produced in the Chongqing factory in October, and will be officially released in the second quarter of next year. The retail network will also be unveiled one after another. The first batch of mass production and user delivery will be achieved in the third quarter of next year, and its sales network will cover about 100 cities across the country.

Compared with the new energy models launched by Changan Automobile before, Avita 11 can be said to be a stunning work. For Changan Automobile, it can be regarded as an epoch-making product in terms of design concept, design language, vehicle shape, driving control performance and intelligence level. Avita also used this to create a new term "emotional intelligent electric vehicle", hoping to add emotional attributes to intelligent electric vehicles and differentiate them from other competitors.

Avita 11 is also the result of a strong collaboration between Changan Automobile, Huawei and CATL. The car was born from the CHN platform jointly built by the three parties, and the three letters of CHN represent each of the three companies. Yu Chengdong, executive director of Huawei, CEO of Consumer BG and CEO of Smart Car Solutions BU, said "Relying on 30 years of technology accumulation in the ICT field, we provide Avita with a comprehensive solution for smart cars through Huawei Inside."

Zeng Yuqun, chairperson of CATL, said: "The cooperation between CATL and Avita Technology began with the joint research and development of the CHN platform, but it goes far beyond technical investment. CATL will provide a steady stream of driving power for the new generation of smart electric vehicles owned by Avita Technology."

The core design concept of Avita 11 is "futuristic", and the overall design follows the design principles of bold confidence, emotional intelligence, and dynamic personality. Its agile and powerful exterior design shows a unique aesthetic charm.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

The Avita 11 features a closed front design, with a slender and angular F-shaped headlight combination that converges the visual center to the logo in the center of the front of the car, condensing it without losing its edge. The aerodynamic package on both sides of the front bumper echoes the F-shaped headlights, with a lidar in the middle of the bumper.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

From the side, the Avita 11 has a slender body with short front and rear overhangs, starting from the C-pillar, and the roof is pressed down to create the posture of a coupe SUV. The side lines of the body are simple and elegant, and the profile is full. The two window lines merge into a sharp V-shaped sharp angle at the rear of the car, and point forcefully to the edge of the C-pillar end, which is very dynamic and dynamic, and echoes the rounded rear wheel arches. The door handles have a hidden design.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

The rear shape of the car is relatively round and looks very stable. Slender through taillights extend to both sides of the tail. The rear window design of the Avita is very characteristic. The shape is inverted trapezoid, and the area is very small, which makes the design of the tailgate feel a bit hatchback.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

From the photos of the actual car, the area of the rear window is indeed very small, and it is unknown whether it will affect the driver’s observation of the rear environment during actual driving.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

Other details of the Avita 11 are not much, and the interior is not open. Currently known information includes a cruising range of at least 700 kilometers, a 0-100km/h acceleration time of less than 4 seconds, a 200kW high-pressure super fast charging and 400Tops of top computing power, making it easy to achieve safe and convenient intelligent driving.

The emotional intelligent electric vehicle proposed by Avita will become a new category, or is it just a concept? The author believes that as the human-machine interaction functions of intelligent electric vehicles become richer and richer, and the interaction patterns become more and more diverse, it is indeed a possibility to give them more emotional attributes. But the premise is that the intelligent level of Avita 11 should reach a high degree, especially the experience of the intelligent cockpit should be completely based on the actual emotional needs of customers.

In fact, some current smart electric vehicles already have certain emotional attributes in terms of product design and function, such as the very unique anthropomorphic image of NOMI on NIO electric vehicles, which has been deeply exploring the emotional needs of human-vehicle interaction. Therefore, if the emotional intelligent electric vehicle proposed by Avita wants to become a new species and new category, it must have a more subversive innovation on the basis of the existing intelligent electric vehicles, otherwise it will not be attractive enough.

Not only Changan Automobile, but also large state-owned automakers such as SAIC, GAC, Dongfeng, and BAIC have established independent subsidiaries to develop new energy vehicle businesses, but they have maintained absolute control of the new energy vehicle subsidiaries. Even Baidu, a joint venture between Baidu and Geely, holds a 55% stake as the leading Baidu. But Avita Technology is an exception.

The predecessor of Avita Technology (Chongqing) Co., Ltd., the operating body of the Avita brand, was "Changan NIO New Energy Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd." (Changan NIO), which was jointly established by Changan Automobile and NIO in July 2018. The two parties held 50% of the shares respectively. Since then, due to NIO’s difficulties and no time to take care of it, Changan NIO has not made progress. In June 2020, Changan Automobile increased its capital to Changan NIO. The shareholding ratio reached 95.38%, and NIO’s share ratio fell to 4.62%. On May 20, 2021, Changan NIO was renamed Avita Technology.

On November 5, 2021, Avita Technology announced the completion of a round of financing, and the registered capital increased from the previous 288 million yuan to about 1.172 billion yuan.

Among them, Changan Automobile increased its capital by 500 million yuan, and Ningde Times increased its capital by 770 million yuan. After this financing, Changan Automobile’s shareholding ratio was diluted from 95.38% to 39.02%; Ningde Times held 23.99%, becoming the second largest shareholder of Avita Technology; Fujian Mindong Times Rural Investment Development Partnership held 5.00%, Chongqing Chengan Private Equity Fund Partnership held 19.01%, Chongqing Liangjiang West Securities Equity Investment Fund Partnership held 1.87%, Southern Industrial Asset Management Co., Ltd. held 8.73%, and Chongqing Southern Industrial Equity Investment Fund Partnership held 1.25%. NIO did not participate in the capital increase, and the shareholding ratio was diluted from 4.62% to 1.13%.

Among the investors mentioned above, Southern Asset is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company of Changan Automobile and one of the top 10 shareholders of Changan Automobile, holding 6.12%. Therefore, it has a relationship with Changan Automobile. Southern Industrial Fund has no relationship with Changan Automobile, but has an equity relationship with Southern Asset.

For the purpose of this financing, Changan Automobile said that the introduction of external resources for equity diversification reform can enhance development vitality, improve operational efficiency, accelerate the integration of new energy vehicle industry chain resources, and continuously expand the development space of the industry chain, ultimately realizing the smooth transformation of Avita Technology Company.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

Why should Changan Automobile give up its absolute controlling stake in Avita? Some people think that Changan Automobile is intentional, which can maximize the vitality of Avita Technology, get rid of the shackles of the state-owned enterprise system, and share risks.

There are also opinions that Changan Automobile is forced to do so. If it does not sell a larger proportion of its equity, it will not be able to attract truly powerful partners, such as Ningde Times. Tan Benhong, CEO of Avita Technology, also said in an interview that smart electric vehicles are a new field, and if you choose a partner with less ability, the hope of success is even more slim.

For the purpose of CATL’s investment in Avita Technology, there is a view that it is to make its highly integrated CTC (Cell to Chassis) technology come to fruition. This technology of integrating battery cells with vehicle chassis will help to significantly reduce the cost of electric vehicles, but it will weaken the dominance of OEMs in the development of electric vehicles and strengthen the voice over battery companies. Therefore, many OEMs are more cautious. CATL’s investment in Avita Technology and becoming its second largest shareholder will help CTC technology land on Avita models.

However, Tan Benhong said in an interview that Avita 11 will use the latest electrification technology of Ningde Times, but it is not clear whether CTC technology will be used. He said "C2C needs to be done when other conditions are ripe."

It is worth noting that Changan Automobile also gave up its controlling stake in financing Changan New Energy. In October 2018, Changan New Energy was publicly listed on the Shanghai United Equity Exchange to increase capital. In December 2019, Nanjing Runke, Changxin Fund, Liangjiang Fund, Southern Industrial Fund and other four parties invested a total of 2.84 billion yuan. Changan Automobile’s shareholding in Changan New Energy was reduced from 100% to 48.95%.

On October 30, Changan Automobile announced that Changan New Energy will introduce a number of strategic investors in the form of public listing on the Shanghai United Equity Exchange, and the planned proceeds raised will not exceed 5 billion yuan. This is the second round of financing since the establishment of Changan New Energy. If the fundraising increases Changan Automobile’s capital by different proportions, then its share ratio in Changan New Energy may be further diluted.

The Avita brand and the Avita 11 have just been unveiled, and from the few details and designs revealed, it has the potential to become a high-end pure electric vehicle, but it has only just begun. The future is still full of unknowns.

On the one hand, the competition in the smart electric vehicle market is becoming increasingly fierce. Some first movers have already established a firm foothold in the market, and the latecomers have to provide more forward-looking and revolutionary products to have the opportunity. It remains to be seen whether Avita’s emotional intelligent electric vehicle can live up to its name. On the other hand, it is also unknown what impact Changan Automobile will bring to this new brand if it gives up its absolute controlling stake in Avita. Based on this, the appearance of Avita 11 is not only an amazing leap for Changan Automobile, but also a thrilling leap.

Avita: The Thrilling Leap of Changan Automobile

Securities Supervision Commission maximum penalty Hengda real estate actual controller Xu Jiayin

On May 31, the Securities Supervision Commission said that it had recently made an administrative penalty decision on Hengda Real Estate’s bond fraud issuance and information disclosure violations according to law, ordered Hengda Real Estate to correct, gave a warning and fined 4.175 billion yuan, and imposed a top fine of 47 million yuan on the then chairperson and actual controller of Hengda Real Estate.

This time, the Securities Supervision Commission punished Hengda Real Estate’s fraudulent issuance of bonds according to 20% of the proceeds raised, and imposed a maximum fine on its information disclosure violations. This is the strictest measure since the unified law enforcement of the bond market. It not only punishes financial fraud severely according to the law, but also fully considers the scale of Hengda Real Estate bonds and the overall work of "guaranteeing the delivery of housing", and insists on the unity of political, social and legal effects. At the same time, the Securities Supervision Commission is promoting the investigation of relevant intermediaries.

Inflated revenue and profits, inExchange market fraud

The Securities Supervision Commission found that from 2019 to 2020, Evergrande Real Estate inflated its income and profits by recognizing its income in advance, resulting in fraudulent issuance of bonds publicly issued in the exchange market, and the relevant annual reports disclosed contained false records. At the same time, Evergrande Real Estate also failed to disclose regular reports on time, failed to disclose major litigation and arbitration as required, and failed to disclose due debts as required.

Securities Supervision Commission administrative penalty decision shows that the punishment involves Xu Jiayin and many other Hengda real estate executives at that time.

In terms of the amount involved, the penalty decision found that in 2019 Hengda Real Estate implemented financial fraud by confirming income in advance, and the false income was 2139.89 billion yuan, accounting for 50.14% of the current operating income, corresponding to the false cost of 173.267 billion yuan, false profit 40.722 billion yuan, accounting for 63.31% of the total profit of the current period.

In 2020, the inflated income was 350.157 billion yuan, accounting for 78.54% of the current operating income, corresponding to 2988.68 billion yuan of inflated costs and 51.289 billion yuan of inflated profits, accounting for 86.88% of the current total profit.

Due to the fact that the relevant data of the 2019 and 2020 annual reports with false records were quoted in the issuance documents announced during the issuance of the above bonds, Evergrande Real Estate fraudulently issued 20.80 billion yuan of bonds from May 2020 to April 2021.

In addition, Evergrande Real Estate failed to disclose the 2021 annual report, 2022 interim report and 2022 annual report on schedule, failed to disclose the situation of major litigation and arbitration as required, and failed to disclose the situation of failing to pay off due debts as required.

The penalty decision shows that as of August 31, 2023, Hengda Real Estate has not disclosed a total of 1533 major litigation and arbitration matters (the amount involved 50 million or more) in a timely manner as required since January 1, 2020, and the amount involved is 431.259 billion yuan.

As of August 31, 2023, Hengda Real Estate has failed to pay off 2,983 maturing debts in a timely manner since January 1, 2021, involving an amount of 2785.31 billion yuan.

Hengda Real Estate’s financial fraud is integratedtransformadvance, Xu Jiayin is to blame

In terms of wording, the punishment decision used terms such as "the means were particularly bad and the circumstances were particularly serious" for Xu Jiayin, the then chairperson. In view of Xu Jiayin’s decision and organization of financial fraud, the means were particularly bad and the circumstances were particularly serious. In accordance with the "Securities Law" and other relevant provisions, Xu Jiayin was banned from the securities market for life.

The Securities Supervision Commission stated that the evidence in the case is sufficient to prove that Xu Jiayin, as the chairperson and actual controller of Evergrande Real Estate, arranged and organized financial fraud, such as asking for the adjusted income level of operating indicators and deciding what index data to use. These related matters are all important components of the financial fraud process, which directly led to the illegal acts of fraudulent issuance and false records in Evergrande Real Estate. Accordingly, the Securities Supervision Commission determined that it made decisions and organized the implementation of financial fraud, and took responsibility for fraudulent issuance and false records in annual reports.

"In addition to failing to fulfill his duty of diligence as chairperson of Evergrande Real Estate, Xu Jiayin used the control of the actual controller over the company to instruct relevant personnel to commit financial fraud," the penalty decision states.

The Securities Supervision Commission believes that the evidence in the case proves that the financial fraud of Hengda Real Estate is the cooperation of the relevant functional areas of business of the company, the company headquarters and the project company are promoted as a whole, and the means of fabricating important facts such as modifying and adjusting the delivery list of the year and modifying the delivery time of the Mingyuan system are taken. It involves a wide range and a large amount of fraud. These matters have obviously exceeded the scope of duties and performance procedures that the chairperson can organize and implement.

Hengda Real Estate Bond Fraudulent Issuance and False Records in Annual Reportsnot exceededstatute of limitations

Xu Jiayin stated in his defense opinion that Hengda Real Estate’s illegal behavior has exceeded the time limit for administrative punishment and should not be subject to administrative punishment, and the audit institution should be held responsible.

In this regard, the Securities Supervision Commission believes that the "Administrative Punishment Law" stipulates that if the illegal act is not discovered within two years, no administrative penalty will be imposed, unless the law provides otherwise. As long as the clues of the illegal act have entered the field of vision of the competent authority, the illegal act should be determined to be "discovered".

In August 2021, Hengda Real Estate risk broke out. In December 2021, relevant departments organized accounting firms to conduct an asset inventory special project audit of Hengda Group. In March 2022, the audit found that Hengda Real Estate was suspected of violations such as early recognition of income. Therefore, the illegal acts involved in the case were discovered by the competent authorities no later than March 2022.

Evergrande Real Estate disclosed its 2019 and 2020 annual reports in April 2020 and April 2021 respectively. At the same time, the issuance time of the five bonds of 20 Evergrande 02, 20 Evergrande 03, 20 Evergrande 04, 20 Evergrande 05, and 21 Evergrande 01 was not earlier than May 26, 2020, and the time of discovery was not more than 2 years from March 2022. The responsible personnel in this case participated in the preparation of false data and reports or signed the corresponding reports and documents, and did not exceed the 2-year time limit for administrative penalties.

In summary, Hengda Real Estate disclosed false records in the 2019 and 2020 annual reports and the illegal issuance of fraudulent bonds of public distribution companies are within the time limit for administrative penalties.

Beijing News Shell Financial Reporter, Zhang Xiaochong, Editor, Chen Li, Proofreader, Lucy

Volvo is really a luxury brand for its quality and safety.

First of all, the quality of Volvo is good. I think the real owner has the most say. After a cursory look at the real owner’s answer below this question, I think I don’t need to repeat the answer. In short, I want to buy a car and go for a test drive first.

Let me briefly talk about some opinions about the rumors of poor quality.

First of all, it was mentioned that various votators on social media touted Volvo’s high safety, thus questioning exaggeration. There is no denying that Volvo can’t get away with it every time, but the root cause of many cases is that under a certain accident base, the number of times Volvo didn’t suffer too much damage in actual collisions must be better than other brands, so there will be so many cases. If it is said that touting one’s own advantages will also attract criticism, then I think the problem may not lie in Volvo products, but in people’s hearts.

Secondly, Volvo was under Ford in the past few years, and the problem of gearbox tuning has been criticized, which persuaded a group of car buyers. However, this problem has been well solved since Volvo changed the Aisin gearbox, and now Volvo’s power system is still very reliable.

Let’s take a look at Volvo’s new car quality ranking in recent years. Let’s first take a look at what this J.D.Power is. J.D. Power’s research is famous for its independence and objectivity, and it is one of the most professional and authoritative market research companies in the world. At the same time, J.D. Power has gained high recognition in the global industrial and commercial circles in terms of automobile customer satisfaction index, and its investigation and research strength in the global and China domestic industries is second to none.

In 2010, the first year that Volvo was bought by Geely, Volvo’s C70 was rated as the best compact luxury sports car by J.D.Power. Then in 2014,
(
get away
) also ranked first in the segment list of medium-sized luxury SUVs announced by J.D.Power. In the same year, Volvo pressed BBA to rank second in the quality list of J.D.Power luxury brands with the score of "45 cars per 100 cars", second only to Porsche.

Looking at the China Quality Research Report published by J.D.Power in 2021, Volvo ranks in the top three, second only to Hehe, which shows that Volvo has been doing this piece of quality with heart.

Finally, we talked recently about the XC40 pure electric ice-breaking experiment conducted by Volvo a few days ago. Although there may be moisture, we have to say that if you pull some new electric assembly cars to freeze at MINUS 20 or 30 degrees, can you drive them out or not? The XC40 pure electric energy frozen for 48 hours can show that Volvo not only passed the quality of oil cars, but also grasped the quality of trams in the process of electrification development.

In the final analysis, it is impossible for Volvo to have no quality problems at all, but most of them are harmless minor problems, which is one of the reasons why Volvo’s repurchase rate has been relatively high. Finally, I think non-car owners don’t have to worry about the quality of Volvo, but prospective car owners can buy it with confidence.